It's this sort of false balance between vaccine science and pseudoscience in the media that I've been calling out for 14 years. Over the last few years I've commented that I've noticed less of this and thought journalists were finally starting to "get it." I was too optimistic.1/https://twitter.com/GenevieveReaume/status/1128135049193246720 …
-
-
Here's a hint. Thomas' "vaxed/unvaxed" study is poorly designed nonsense, but she still reports it and even let's him brash about how he's trying to get it published!
6b/6https://twitter.com/genevievereaume/status/1128000660685746176 …
Show this thread -
Here's what I mean. 6c/6https://respectfulinsolence.com/2019/01/25/ipak-running-dubious-study/ …
Show this thread -
Let's just say there's a reason why I refer to Dr. Paul Thomas as a rising star in the antivaccine movement, and in this story he was credulously treated as another potentially valid viewpoint. 6d/6https://respectfulinsolence.com/2018/03/09/dr-paul-thomas-newest-antivaccine-pediatrician-making-name-himself/ …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
3/
6a/6