I have to agree here. I've been expecting #Daenerys to ultimately burn King's Landing for several seasons now and am puzzled that it's a surprise to so many fans. #GameofThroneshttps://apple.news/ADOHRR3G0RI-bpwtJqAFwSQ …
-
-
Exactly. Her descent into madness was basically vertical.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They needed a Dany focused episode to flesh out the transition. It’s such an important moment, it was hinted at but the actual transition seems too sudden.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It needed to happen in a setting where the larger plot actually made sense. She and Cersei were both plotted in this episode as being rather mindless and it wasn't compelling to watch, to me. Why not have her act horribly but in a tactical way, like destroying the whole Red Keep?
-
Because that wouldn't have burned the city and killed tens of thousands of civilians. The Red Keep is only a relatively small area of the whole city.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Or, like others have tweeted, Cersei could have fake-surrendered and her trap for Dany could have not worked, leading to a showdown in person. As one of a million more interesting possibilities than what we got.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It needed more time. She’s always been brutal, but never burn-women-and-children brutal, so her descent needed to be fleshed out. It looked like she just snapped—worse than her dad—so to me it felt like she’s now just a plot device for other characters.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.