I will admit that some of the responses agreeing with the "evil" of this ad are so hilarious as to be beyond parody, though.https://twitter.com/bennyseattle/status/1126260039604248577 …
-
Show this thread
-
David Gorski, MD, PhD Retweeted Benny Nomad
And—surprise! surprise!—he's antivax too!https://twitter.com/bennyseattle/status/1126260238099685376 …
David Gorski, MD, PhD added,
4 replies 1 retweet 23 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @gorskon
Regarding vaccines, I know several people who work in the schools and they tell me how sick the kids are these days. Over time we should be getting healthier not less well. Something is different in our environment. Vaccines, GMO's, exposure to electronics, not sure but something
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BennySeattle @gorskon
Look up “availability heuristic,” dude.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
you're assuming he didn't just fabricate the entire thing (he did)
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
I generally try to apply the principle of charity in interacting with others, but I get where you’re coming from.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I've heard it many times, things like ADD, autism, allergies, chronic medical conditions of various types and learning disabilities are much more common than they used to be. Something changed. What was it? Maybe multiple things. Anyway it's hurting the kids.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
you’ve “heard it.” meanwhile, there’s a whole world of research out there showing, for example, that vaccines cause none of those things, but because you think you “heard” something you blame vaccines. It’s as uncritical as thinking gets.
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
If there are no vaccine injuries then why do we have a vaccine court paying out billions in damages?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Ah, you’re that kind of denialist. The vaccine court exists to ensure manufacturers don’t exit the market. It never establishes whether a so-called “vaccine injury” has occurred.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
Also, the Vaccine Court pays complainant court costs, win it list, and has laxer standards than regular court.
-
-
They are immune to prosecution in normal courts. Why should that be the case? Also doesn't this immunity give the pharma companies incentive to send unsafe products to market? Seems like a perverse incentive to me.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BennySeattle @gorskon and
There are liability protections as part of the compromise behind vaccine court. They’re not absolute. The reasons, as explained, are two fold. To protect the vaccine supply, keeping children healthy, and to make compensation easier.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.