It had nothing to do with abortion. Nothing at all. Nor does it have anything to do with viewing pregnancy as a disease. It is simply an observation of how cancer mimics and hijacks natural processes. 2/
-
-
Show this thread
-
Indeed, an old theory of cancer proposed by British embyologist John Beard in 1902 was the trophoblastic theory of cancer, based on the resemblance of cancer behavior to that of the trophoblast. It turned out not to be correct. 3/
Show this thread -
It does, however, show that biologists noticed the resemblance between cancer behavior and that of the embryo a very long time ago. Again, this has nothing to do with abortion. Dylan is an idiot. 4/4
Show this thread -
Holy crap. I just noticed that Dylan is a medical student. Clearly, his medical school failed to educate him about cancer biology. How embarrassing for him.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
But does the comparison have any scientific value? Does it provide insight on how to fight uterine cancer?
-
No, it's just an analogy to help students understand cancer processes, or in this individuals case ... not.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
For some know-it-all arrogantly obsessed with his self worth and perceived intellect, it's pathetic how you always spew half of your compulsively demeaning texted assaults with actually no more sophistication than that of a spoiled brat 3rd grader using an advanced vocabulary.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.