Will read it. What are your thoughts on the analysis from JAMA I sent you?
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Specific issue here is number of errors. No one is disputing that medical errors exist & we can & should learn from them
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
That’s total bollux. Disputing the numbers isn’t denial, it’s understanding the issue. It’s understanding clinical medicine. Sorry, there are no short cuts here
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Why don’t you just accept it already? It’s a problem! Are you denying it’s a problem? Do you hate patients? If you don’t accept our shoddy methods and inflate numbers to scare the shit out of people you hate patients *and* puppies. Do you hate puppies too?
4 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @MarkHoofnagle @RogueRad and
David Gorski, MD, PhD Retweeted David Gorski, MD, PhD
I love puppies; so I must accept enormously inflated numbers... Oh wait...
https://twitter.com/gorskon/status/1062700355488808962 …David Gorski, MD, PhD added,
David Gorski, MD, PhDVerified account @gorskonGiven all the badness in the world, I'm going to intersperse my Twitter rants about quackery and Donald Trump with cute pictures and videos of the 3 week old puppies my wife and I are fostering. You're welcome. pic.twitter.com/YOgFsrCuYdShow this thread1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
I’m apparently a bully for pointing out innumeracy and inconsistency are a poor platform for advocacy.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @MarkHoofnagle @RogueRad and
At least you haven't been blocked...yet.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
I will when I just start replying with “that’s numberwang!”pic.twitter.com/MjB9bXfhb7
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes
Brilliant! I need to start doing that too when appropriate.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.