WTF, @thedailybeast? @JFKucinich's article on @delbigtree is basically free publicity for this antivax crank. I'll explain what I mean. 1/https://www.thedailybeast.com/anti-vaxxer-del-bigtree-got-his-start-on-the-tv-show-the-doctors …
-
Show this thread
-
There is no false balance. Thanks for reading.
4 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @JFKucinich @gorskon and
No false balance? We did this with your last article... Maybe it doesn't mean what you think it means?
2 replies 1 retweet 12 likes -
Replying to @AboutPediatrics @gorskon and
You never emailed or called me. I asked for your POV and you ignored me. Don’t pretend to be helpful out here and go dark in the real world.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JFKucinich @AboutPediatrics and
I assume you aren't talking to me here, because I do not recall ever having been contacted by you. I even searched my email.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @JFKucinich and
She's talking to me... To be clear, the things we do to educate people about vaccine safety is the real world. Not how you choose to write about it. I choose to not respond because of the tone of your first article about RFK, Jr and your response to our criticism of it.
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @AboutPediatrics @JFKucinich and
Can someone pay a link to the article in question?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @AboutPediatrics and1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @ClutchScience @gorskon and
Those who engaged with Kucinich on this found that she had a pretty big chip on her shoulder re: our concerns. At the time I was skeptical that her offer of back channel comm with some of the Peds in the convo was made in good faith. And now she's using that as a cudgel, so
2 replies 2 retweets 2 likes
Well, she certainly was contemptuously dismissive of my criticism (she called it "yelling on Twitter"), even though I've been writing about and studying the antivaccine movement for nearly two decades.
-
-
Replying to @gorskon @AboutPediatrics and
QED I'd think if she was truly interested in getting the science based angle on these stories, she wouldn't be so quick to flame some of the most vocal and accessible sources around.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ClutchScience @gorskon and
I don't know about accessible... Don't forget that I already ghosted her once.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.