For a much more detailed explanation of why it is almost never a good idea to debate cranks and pseudoscientists, consider this post I wrote about a much less odious crank, Andrew Weil. 13/https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/to-debate-or-not-to-debate-the-strange-bedfellows-of-andrew-weil/ …
-
-
So let's just put it this way. A little tantrum on
@delbigtree's part in which he attacks me as coward on his podcast or on Facebook or Twitter barely registers with me. I've dealt with far worse for a long time. I also consider the source, and laugh. 24/Show this thread -
If anyone sites consider debating
@delbigtree, though, I recommend@thereal_truther's approach. 25/25https://twitter.com/thereal_truther/status/1115650520692080640 …
Show this thread -
If anyone does consider debating... And I thought I'd caught all the typos and predictive typing errors.

Show this thread -
And, yes, I know there are other typos that I missed, but they're simple single substitution errors that don’t really affect meaning, as readers know what I meant.

Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.