Got some more sources? You see, history, like medicine, is all about the confluence of evidence. One source is never enough to make a definitive conclusion. One book, particularly not peer-reviewed, does not impress me.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
You sure don't understand science very well if you don't understand that it's a confluence of evidence that leads to changes in scientific understanding. I am amused, however. Pray, continue.

1 reply 0 retweets 18 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
You just admitted that you don't know science. You clearly also don't know history. I remain amused because Dunning-Kruger amuses me.
1 reply 0 retweets 11 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
You seem to be the only one here who's been "triggered." Personally, I'm just amused to have encountered such concentrated Dunning-Kruger.
0 replies 0 retweets 9 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
That's a rather dangerous attitude: to be utterly convinced that you can't be wrong, even when people who are experts are telling you that you are wrong.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes
Yes, indeed. I characterized her as suffering from Dunning-Kruger syndrome,and her answer above just confirmed my characterization a thousandfold!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.