I'm not at all fond of the term "pseudoscience police." It reminds me too much of "grammar police, "tone police," "PC police," etc. It has negative connotations and is just a step or two removed from "pseudoscience Nazis." 1/https://twitter.com/pedipsych/status/1114915201386782721 …
-
-
Elswhere, I agree that it's important to know what our purpose is. Personally, I'm for taking licenses away from quacks and preventing quack specialties (e.g., naturopathy) from attaining state licensure status. 5/
Show this thread -
I'm also OK with bringing public pressure on tech and social media companies like Facebook or YouTube to halt (or at least inhibit) the spread of pseudoscience like cancer quackery and antivaccine misinformation on their platforms. 6/
Show this thread -
But lose the "pseudoscience police." I almost didn't bother to read the article because "pseudoscience police" struck me as dismissive and sarcastic. 7/7
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Someone today labeled the latter "pro-plaguers". I think I like it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.