Monsanto has a moral obligation to tell the public what it knows about the health effects of its weedkiller, Roundup, before more people get sick.https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/19/business/monsanto-roundup-cancer.html …
-
-
Senator, the science is pretty clear on this. Unfortunately 2 juries failed to understand that. Please do not spread this one. It will 100% prevent me from supporting you in the primary.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Very disappointing
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Transparency is always good, though.
-
This is not transparency, though. It's a jury mangling science.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I can't read the article because NYT got smart to private mode. However, it's entirely possible that the additives, could be a bigger risk than the pesticide itself, and only really a danger to those applying it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
Good for you Senator. Agreed. Amazing how Doc Gorski likes to bang on about the primacy of the evidence base except it seems when such produces a result he doesn't like in spite of it being supported by endless top tier expert witnesses in a lengthy trial
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
how many studies do you want? unfounded and inflamed fear about the safety of glyphosate is the most ludicrous, bogus non issue in decades, brought to you by organic fear based marketing. there's no there there.pic.twitter.com/Bf3dt49dDT
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.