It can't be that Dr. Orient doesn't consider any vaccine to be safe and effective (because she's an antivaxer), could it? Perish the thought! 
-
-
Great questions! If any antivaxxer has any real science, I am willing to listen to it. But, there is none.
1 reply 1 retweet 13 likes -
Replying to @DrLindaMD @gorskon
There is plenty of evidence of vaccine adverse effects. Isn't that real science? And does absence of evidence from safety trials that have not been done= evidence of absence--firm enough to justify suspension of need for consent? The damaged kids are real.
7 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jorient @DrLindaMD
What would be these "safety trials" that haven't been done?
1 reply 2 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @DrLindaMD
Again, long-term randomized prospective trials with an unvaccinated control group. The recent touted Danish trial doesn't meet those criteria. CDC stonewalled FOIA requests for safety trials on hep b in newborns
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jorient @DrLindaMD
Such a trial design would be breathtakingly unethical, because leaving a control group unvaccinated and therefore vulnerable to deadly vaccine-preventable diseases would massively violate the Nuremberg Code and the Declaration of Helsinki.
3 replies 1 retweet 24 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @DrLindaMD
So mass immunization without adequate safety testing is ok? And the informed consent in Nuremberg code does not apply to vaccines? And measles, mumps, and chickenpox are "deadly diseases"?
12 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jorient @DrLindaMD
Epidemiological studies ARE adequate safety testing once the original RCTs for each new vaccine are completed, particularly when they involve millions of subjects.
3 replies 0 retweets 29 likes -
Millions of subjects across multiple populations over multiple continents over decades of data.....
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
These people have absolutely no clue as to how many tens of millions of unvaccinated kids we would need to follow for decades in order to squeeze out a statistically significant difference, given the extremely low pre-test probability for the vaccine “injuries” they’re claiming.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
Don't try to explain pre-test probability and statistical power to Dr. Orient. Her head might explode.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.