Advocate all you want for vaccines. But patients still have the right to choose. And the right to hear those who disagree that all vaccines are effective and safe enough to force on people. Using force discredits the case.https://twitter.com/DrLindaMD/status/1108206936590290945 …
-
-
It's clear
@jorient knows nothing about clinical trial ethics, or she wouldn't propose a randomized prospective trial with an unvaccinated control group. Or maybe she does know and is cynically proposing this study because she knows it will never be done. -
I'm starting to think it's the latter. She does know that such a trial would be unethical and would never be done. Because it would never be done, she never has to give up her antivaccine talking point about requiring a randomized "vaxed/unvaxed" study to convince her. Cynical.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
So mass immunization without adequate safety testing is ok? And the informed consent in Nuremberg code does not apply to vaccines? And measles, mumps, and chickenpox are "deadly diseases"?
-
Epidemiological studies ARE adequate safety testing once the original RCTs for each new vaccine are completed, particularly when they involve millions of subjects.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Wow. Is she an actual medical doctor advocating for innocent babies and children to be used as guinea pigs to try and prove her theory that vaccines are more harmful than the diseases they prevent?
-
Sums it up pretty well.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
