Everyone in mainstream medicine already agrees that clinical trials and postlicensing vigilance are required to measure vaccine risks, and that vaccines which aren't quite safe should not be on the market. Do you feel a particular serious risk hasn't been measured and is high?
-
-
Replying to @dkegel @Corazon17Fuerte and
Yeah, no one is arguing those points. Orient has basically argued natural immunity to measles from the recent outbreaks is good for those patients despite our knowledge that measles natural immunity comes with destruction of your memory B cell population and increased mortality.
1 reply 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @MarkHoofnagle @dkegel and
Further she has argued against public health measures generally as she believes they conflict your freedumb to fight your own individual battles with communicable diseases. It’s not reasonable concern, it’s ideologic idiocy.
3 replies 1 retweet 7 likes -
Replying to @MarkHoofnagle @dkegel and
An example of obsession with freedom/rights/liberty with total disregard for intellectual integrity and civic responsibility.
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @SteveTiger999 @dkegel and
They also inevitably turn out to be grifters, which I think is a feature of this extreme libertarian ideologue that thinks markets should determine everything including what is fraud. They’re saying they think there is nothing wrong with fraud except when it’s not profitable.
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @MarkHoofnagle @dkegel and
Certainly, there are those who see a market opportunity--a gullible audience--and cash in on it.
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @SteveTiger999 @MarkHoofnagle and
when immune from liability and you can force everybody to take your product, the opportunity is great. Are there other such gigs aside from vaccines?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jorient @SteveTiger999 and
Extreme right wing quack seems like an interesting gig.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cacoethes_carpe @jorient and
Yeah. We’re all just rolling in vaccine money.
3 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @MarkHoofnagle @cacoethes_carpe and
Also, it's an antivaccine distortion that vaccine manufacturers are immune from liability. They aren't. If a complainant to the Vaccine Court loses, he can sure the vaccine manufacturer.
5 replies 2 retweets 6 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.