What’s next? “They laughed at Galileo too”?
-
-
Well at least she acknowledged her initial argument was foolish. The “single observation” has now become an n=1000s. Granted, she can’t prove any if this, just cite crank literature that we should rely on evidence based on adversarial debate because we only prove whats funded.
-
It’s a fascinating notion. That academia relying on grants is more corrupted by money than the legal system - that brought us cash bail and the OJ trial. Clearly it’s not influenced by wealth *at all*.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Why don't you. An open discussion might be fun--if you would permit that.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.