Ah, yes. This is why I laugh when a member of @AAPSonline claims that the organization is not antivax. One wonders if the complain as loudly about government attempts to limit what doctors can say to patients and study about gun violence.https://twitter.com/jorient/status/1106278606592892928 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @gorskon @AAPSonline
Are you pro censorship? With yourself as Grand Inquisitor?
6 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
If there were organizations that promoted smoking as healthy online, do you think the AMA would and should urge social media to suppress that information? Both vaccine preventable infectious diseases and smoking are public health threats. Would that be pro-censorship?
1 reply 1 retweet 34 likes -
The AMA did advertise cigarettes at one time despite suspicion of harm. Unsafe vaccines may be more of a public health threat than the diseases they are intended to prevent. Another AMA coverup to protect its commercial interests?
9 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
The association this woman heads up published articles saying that HIV does not cause AIDS, that being gay reduces life expectancy, that there's a link between abortion and breast cancer, & that there was a dramatic increase in leprosy (there wasn't) due to immigrants. Just mute.
1 reply 3 retweets 39 likes -
Replying to @Jeanthejust @jorient and
I've also learned that St. Orient signed the "doctors' dissent from Darwinism" letter. Also, she denies climate science and even the very concept of a scientific consensus.https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/hostility-towards-scientific-consensus-a-red-flag-identifying-a-crank-or-quack/ …
1 reply 2 retweets 28 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @Jeanthejust and
Consensus is the enemy of science. Particularly a fake consensus, What about the consensus on Ptolemy, or spontaneous generation, or bad air as the cause of malaria, etc.
8 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
What’s next? “They laughed at Galileo too”?
3 replies 2 retweets 25 likes -
Replying to @Takethatdoctors @jorient and
David Gorski, MD, PhD Retweeted David Gorski, MD, PhD
David Gorski, MD, PhD added,
David Gorski, MD, PhDVerified account @gorskonSilly doctor. Boiled down to its essence, what is a scientific theory but the current best consensus about a specific natural phenomenon (e.g., the theory of evolution, germ theory, the theory of relativity, etc.)? 1/ https://twitter.com/jorient/status/1107035447601954816 …Show this thread1 reply 1 retweet 13 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @Takethatdoctors and
Science is based on observations. One observation can destroy a beautiful theory. Real scientists try to disprove their theories, not to silence criticism of them.
17 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
One REPRODUCIBLE observation. You seem to have neglected to mention that one critical point.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.