Anyone who denies being antivax but says something as risible as "unsafe vaccines may be more of a public health threat than the diseases they are intended to prevent" is not very self-aware. Suggesting that vaccines do more harm than good is the very definition of antivax.https://twitter.com/jorient/status/1106745888720846849 …
-
-
Replying to @gorskon
I don’t believe her statement is true either. AMA didn’t advertise cigarettes, but they may have bought advertisements in JAMA until 1953 when they banned tobacco ads. They used pictured ofdoctors in advertisements but it was never an AMA recommendation to smoke.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @MarkHoofnagle @gorskon
"I don't believe her statement is true. . " Could have stopped right there?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MHPoison1 @gorskon
Well she makes it sound like the AMA recommended cigarettes, when really their magazine, like many, accepted advertising dollars for tobacco. But they stopped in 1953, way ahead of anyone else and if anything showed they valued principle over profit in doing so.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Now. Ask the same of her, is AAPS as rigorously ethical about disclosure and financing their BS? Based on Tom Price, and basically every crooked quack I’ve ever met from that organization, I suspect not. He stood out for ethical malfeasance even within the Trump admin.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes
Of course, @AAPSonline is a radical right wing organization disguised as a medical professional society. It's full of Ayn Rand-worshiping doctors who hold up Dr. Thomas Hendricks the brain surgeon in "Atlas Shrugged" as their role model.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.