Not accurate but official and all we have, Almost certainly errs by under-reporting
-
-
Replying to @jorient @AlastairMcA30 and
I bet she can't tell me the names of the active surveillance systems for adverse reactions to vaccines. (Yes, there are more than one.)
1 reply 1 retweet 18 likes -
Let's just say that VAERS is most definitely NOT "all we have." Dr. Orient, you're really not very good at this. You don't even know the basics. It's cringeworthy to watch, and you should be embarrassed.
6 replies 1 retweet 33 likes -
-
Replying to @jorient @AlastairMcA30 and
You show me yours first, since I asked first—multiple times.

2 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @AlastairMcA30 and
you are the aggressor--you have the burden of proof. Show us something better than VAERS. And ONE large long-term study with an unvaccinated control? ONE paper about follow-up of VAERS reports.
8 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @thereal_truther @jorient and
Has she actually proposed this? Even she should know that such a study would be totally unethical.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @thereal_truther and
Is it ethical to experiment on the whole population with large numbers of inadequately tested vaccines--and untested combinations? A no-no for antihypertensives?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Vaccines are tested more than any other medical intervention or drug in human history. Development and testing of vaccines generally takes 10-25 YEARS.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
Yes, that was one of the more spectacularly ignorant things said by Doc Orient thus far, that vaccines are "inadequately tested." One wonders what she would consider adequate testing.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.