Not accurate but official and all we have, Almost certainly errs by under-reporting
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @jorient @AlastairMcA30 and
I bet she can't tell me the names of the active surveillance systems for adverse reactions to vaccines. (Yes, there are more than one.)
1 reply 1 retweet 18 likes -
Let's just say that VAERS is most definitely NOT "all we have." Dr. Orient, you're really not very good at this. You don't even know the basics. It's cringeworthy to watch, and you should be embarrassed.
6 replies 1 retweet 33 likes -
-
Replying to @jorient @AlastairMcA30 and
You show me yours first, since I asked first—multiple times.

2 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @AlastairMcA30 and
you are the aggressor--you have the burden of proof. Show us something better than VAERS. And ONE large long-term study with an unvaccinated control? ONE paper about follow-up of VAERS reports.
8 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
For any lurkers: https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/61/6/980/451431 … Follow-up of deaths reported to VAERS, no concerning trends noted and no evidence vaccines were causal.pic.twitter.com/C5nlcQe9Cu
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @aetiology @jorient and
I wonder if Doc Orient knows the difference between VAERS and VSD.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
I'm so tired of the trope that nothing is ever investigated and VAERS reports all mean confirmed vaccine deaths (or other injuries). Shameful that some doctors keep spreading it.
2 replies 0 retweets 9 likes
Yep. It's bad enough that it's an antivaccine talking point that is parroted by pretty much every antivaxer, but for doctors to parrot it too... Anyone who credulously repeats it is either antivax or very ignorant about vaccine safety.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.