Except that the data shows exactly the opposite of what you are claiming
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Cool story bro. Not my fault you are presenting factually incorrect information. That's on you.
0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
so you don't know where numbers on the poster come from?
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @mcfunny @JPSportsminer and
I suspect that I do. It looks like Anthony Mawson's awful "vaxxed vs. unvaxxed" survey. (I won't dignify it by calling it a study.https://respectfulinsolence.com/2016/11/29/antivaccinationists-promote-a-bogus-internet-survey-hilarity-ensues-as-its-retracted/ …
4 replies 3 retweets 14 likes -
It's a study that had been retracted and risen from the grave before.https://respectfulinsolence.com/2017/02/24/another-zombie-antivaccine-study-rises-from-the-grave/ …
2 replies 3 retweets 9 likes -
It was retracted again.https://respectfulinsolence.com/2017/05/09/a-boatload-of-fail-were-two-horrendously-bad-zombie-vaxedantivaxed-studies-retracted/ …
2 replies 2 retweets 10 likes
Then, apparently the pay-to-publish check finally cleared, and it was back online in a predatory open access journal.https://respectfulinsolence.com/2017/05/18/the-check-must-have-finally-cleared-or-mawsons-incompetent-vaxedunvaxed-study-is-back-online/ …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.