Yup. RFK Jr. is hard core antivax. So is Mary Holland. Ditto Toni Bark. Rick Jaffe is a lawyer who specializes in representing quacks like @DrStanBurzynski. @picphysicians is a hard core antivax group disguised as a a group advocating "informed consent."
-
-
Replying to @gorskon @Rosewind2007 and
If
@PGtzsche1 was unaware of these facts before, he is no longer. Will be pull out of this antivax confab where he's agreed to appear? I predict no, because he's become antivax.1 reply 3 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @Rosewind2007 and
And he’s giving a talk that, by its title, is designed to appeal to this antivaccine audience. Basically catering to them.
1 reply 2 retweets 15 likes -
Replying to @doritmi @Rosewind2007 and
Indeed. It's a talk that Mary Holland or RFK Jr. himself could give. Hell, Andrew Wakefield could give it. I know
@PGtzsche1 hates being compared to Wakefield, but right now the shoe seems to fit.1 reply 4 retweets 15 likes -
Sorry guys, I'll believe he is antivax when I hear or read him talking against vaccination. Talking amongst a group of antivax people isn't enough after everything he's done. I'll be eager to read/watch more about this. In the meantime my admiration for him remains put.
5 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Giving a talk on an antivaccine topic in an antivaccine event is a strange thing for someone who is not antivaccine. It’s touching that you trust him to the extent of ignoring it, but it’s also probably over trusting.
1 reply 2 retweets 14 likes -
I have noticed a rather cult-like air about
@PGtzsche1's followers. So it doesn't surprise me that their motivated reasoning is strong enough too make excuses for his appearing with antivaxers at an antivax workshop organized by an antivax organization.2 replies 2 retweets 11 likes -
Cult-like air? Funny that. Oh..and unnecesarily offensive for a professional conversation. I admire his brave stand and agree with him on many issues. No blindness or faith involved.
4 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
I beg to differ. You're making excuses for Gøtzsche giving a talk with a title strongly suggesting antivax views, along with antivaxers at an antivax workshop organized by an antivax organization. That's motivated reasoning at least, willful blindness at worst.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
And you choose to remain offensive. Look, I'll be happy to change my views on him if I read/hear a general antivax attitude. In the meantime, I'll hold my breath.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Your defense of Gøtzsche's appearance at @picphysicians is offensive to me. So I'm not unduly concerned if my criticism of his lending his name and reputation to antivax pseudoscience offends you.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.