So Steve Pinker doesn't understand IRBs or human subjects research ethics either, at least not enough to understand that this is not a clear cut question, which is why it's appropriate for the IRB to investigate. Good to know. https://twitter.com/peterboghossian/status/1082430087746674689 …
Not only that, but he created fraudulent studies. Pinkett says it was an obvious hoax, but was it? Would it be obvious when the ethos in academia is to trust that colleagues are playing straight when they try to publish their work?
-
-
Pretty obvious, especially when the reviewers actively encouraged them to skew the 'data' even more without evidence.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.