How could you, @NatGeo? This is basically a propaganda piece for the prescientific, pseudoscientific, and mystical quackery that is traditional Chinese medicine. Not a single serious skeptic was interviewed. 1/ https://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/2019/01/ancient-chines-remedies-changing-modern-medicine/ …
-
-
"Indeed it has, and then we tested it all, and the stuff that worked became 'medicine'. And the rest of it is just a nice bowl of soup and some potpourri" -Dara O'Briain
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Argh! But let’s be honest, National Geographic was always better known for its pictures than its “science”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
