How could you, @NatGeo? This is basically a propaganda piece for the prescientific, pseudoscientific, and mystical quackery that is traditional Chinese medicine. Not a single serious skeptic was interviewed. 1/ https://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/2019/01/ancient-chines-remedies-changing-modern-medicine/ …
-
-
The caption, part 2: "The therapy aims to treat joint pain and other ailments, but research has yet to prove such claims." Research has yet to prove these claims? Ya think?


4/Show this thread -
In any case,
@oracknows will have something to say about this article tomorrow. The false balance in it is epic, worthy of only the most massive facepalm. 5/5pic.twitter.com/vZsr17h27N
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Oh yes I suppose 3rd degree burns do open the pores.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.