Antivax technobabble. I really need to think of a better term for this. I've tried "woo-babble," but it's too general a term that can be applied to any quackery or woo that hides behind a lot of science-y sounding gibberish. I need one specific to antivaxers.https://twitter.com/KittyAmnezia/status/1080904374723989504 …
-
-
-
-
Replying to @FlatheadDynasty @gorskon
How am I? I'm just asking questions? What on earth is wrong with encouraging debate?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @KittyAmnezia @gorskon
Yes you're certainly JAQing off. There is no debate. Your calls for unethical testing ignore the entire process used for getting a vaccination approved and your psuedo-scientific gobbledygook shows bad faith engagement or massive ignorance. The debate is settled. Science won.
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @FlatheadDynasty @gorskon
Fair enough. If you feel the current testing method is acceptable - and suitable for the entire population, that's your choice. I personally don't believe enough has been done
6 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
The beautiful thing about science is that it works whether you believe in it or not.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
