Alex (who almost certainly made this comment) left out the first part of the sentence, which was, "Even though the campaign to ban smoking in public places wasn't based on entirely solid science..." Funny that.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @ACSHorg @AlexBerezow
You cited a dubious, biased,poorly argued article by a bartender and Cato Institute flack whose history demonstrates bias to preface your statement. (I also saw the Tweet you deleted.) Sorry, won't fly.
https://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/the-science-of-smoking-bans/ …0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Replying to @ACSHorg @AlexBerezow
Not at all. However, in THIS case Jacob Grier, the author of the article you cited, most definitely is. (He's a bartender with little knowledge of science as well.) Sleep tight. 
10:17 PM - 10 Dec 2018
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.