public options would be and intermediate step between the status quo and medicare for all which we are not likely to see until we have a democratic president and majority in both houses.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But this is America. We're different. Somehow, I don't know. It's never been explained.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
HOW IS THE GERMAN SYSTEM ANYTHING LIKE OBAMACARE? IT FEATURES COMPULSORY ENROLLMENT IN NON-PROFIT PLANS AND PREMIUMS ARE SET/CAPPED BY PROGRESSIVE TAXATION. THERE'S A LIMITED PRIVATE OPTION FOR THOSE ABOVE A CERTAIN INCOME LEVEL BUT FEW TAKE IT.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Netherlands, ACA closely resembles the Dutch "Insurance with conscience." https://international.commonwealthfund.org/countries/netherlands/ … One of the stultifying aspects of healthcare debate is how no one realizes fully nationalized systems are a tiny minority of systems (3)- Canada, GB, NZ.
-
Yup.
@daveweigel appears to be in that club: Apparently unaware that only a small fraction of nations that guarantee universal health care have chosen fully nationalized, single-payer systems. - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Also Canada! (Source: I am a Canadian who would have long ago died/become homeless w/o it)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.