Stop conflating the judicial standard of evidence for a criminal conviction with the standard of evidence needed to confirm a SCOTUS nominee. It's dishonest. The two are not the same, and this is not a criminal case given that the statute of limitations is long past.https://twitter.com/WalshFreedom/status/1043872479142432769 …
-
Show this thread
This is an interview for a job that is a lifetime appointment and from which, for all practical purposes, Kavanaugh can't be fired. It's not a criminal trial. Treating its evidentiary standards as though it were a criminal trial is, again, dishonest.
0 replies
1 retweet
15 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.