I have a BIG problem with this—and all cancer quackery—and that's informed consent. Quacks always overpromise and underestimate the risks. Also, these parents are the victims of a con and that's how I view these cases, as examples of fraud that actively harms the child.https://twitter.com/ABatemanHouse/status/1040657617109086210 …
-
-
Presumably, it's not. It's not the choice I'd have made. But IF there were true informed consent (which u r correct to question), IF the family is paying (not me, not the country), and IF there is no available evidence it will cause more harm, I'm ok with the parents deciding
-
When this is so obviously quackery, I am not. In fact, I'd be seriously tempted to call medical neglect here.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.