No. It isn't. It's a win for those who want longer lines at the voting both in the primarily urban areas more likely to vote Democrat. It's a win for those who want to suppress the vote in those areas by making voting more time consuming. You're fooling no one.https://twitter.com/justinamash/status/1037535462783692800 …
-
-
Regardless, it isn't hard to look at the ballot and check every Republican or Democrat candidate if that's what you want to do. You don't even have to look at the names, even though I firmly believe each candidate, not his/her party, should receive a vote. This isn't China.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So instead of increasing polling places and lengthening the time younhave to vote, you want to make it easier for people to vote without thinking about who they are voting for?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wow, you're a very spiteful man, aren't you?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hence: "To fix long lines we need more polling places and longer voting periods."
-
Yup, I think what he's saying is, if we have more polling places he'd be OK with eliminating straight ticket voting.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.