Are you serious @gorskon ? You haven't even seen the articles on @jordanbpeterson & you're assuming there is no skepticism in them? You've violated every skeptical principle there is in 1 tweet. For you skepticism = denial/debunking & evidence is irrelevant—you are not a skeptic!https://twitter.com/gorskon/status/1029734063698051073 …
-
-
I've always thought 'skepticism' is a meaningless term unless an object of skepticism is specified. When Carl Sagan was the public face of skepticism, the object was pseudoscience. Now, sadly, many prominent skeptics have made science itself the object. Sad!
-
Good point, for example the antivaxers who call themselves vaccine ‘skeptics’

- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Seems epidemic. Shermer had opportunity to rationally challenge Teicholz on harmful medical misinformation she promotes, but instead chose to join her in vacuous conspiracy theories & endorsement of her woo. It’s tragic.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
