Cigarrettes are poision. Roundup is poision. https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/how-toxic-is-the-worlds-most-popular-herbicide-roundup-30308 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
then why don't you just take a nice big gulp of Roundup and let us know how that works out for you
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
either case, Johnson did not sue because he consumed Roundup, he sued because Monsanto 'failed to warn Johnson and other consumers about the risks posed by its weed-killing products.' A jury agreed.
6 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Failure to warn is simply a different flavor of a product liability claim. The other two are design defect and manufacturing defect. Failure to warn is the most appropriate for this type of exposure case.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @wallybongo @delilahheltonaz and
You can only fail to warn IF you know of a risk. I can only assume that you haven’t followed the evidence. It’s pretty much all in the public domain now. Try studying it and divorce yourself from the hype and cherry picked newsbites.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @marcdraco63 @wallybongo and
1. If you follow the evidence 2. It’s in the public domain 1a) Jurors received the best (one assumes) evidence Monsanto could possibly give them. 2a) They’re not allowed to do their own research. So they followed the best evidence and arrived at that conclusion.
6 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Also, I've part of a day-by-day account. Expert witnesses for the plaintiff got to say some really stupid and unscientific things. One doctor in particular basically declared glyphosate caused cancer but couldn't provide any evidence. The jury loved him.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.