I mean, the studies claiming a link had a small number of those with cancer who had been exposed to glyphosate, and a huge epidemiological study found no link. Overall the data are most consistent with the conclusion that glyphosate doesn't cause cancer. https://plantoutofplace.com/2018/08/glyphosate-and-cancer-revisited/ …
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Signage on a new car: WARNING, by driving this vehicle, you must be made aware that the mechanical system could fail & you could fall out of the sky at any moment.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We are talking about California.....where there are warning labels exist on air fresheners
-
Yet even in woo-central, those warnings have to be based on some scientific evidence.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I don't believe there is sufficient evidence on either side to determine whether or not glysophate is a carcinogen as there are interests on both sides who get in the way. People see what they want to see. https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/who-iarc-glyphosate/ …
-
That you "don't believe" the evidence doesn't mean it's insufficient.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
For
#bees it could be an issue - Show replies
-
-
-
But see
@gmo_science for peer-reviewed studies regarding health risks from glyphosate/roundup -
The style and quality of the "evidence" presented there remind me of antivax sites.

- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.