It's amazing how many people would read this headline and scoff who also feel that a California jury can determine glyphosate causes cancer.pic.twitter.com/yWRElahSzk
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
It's amazing how many people would read this headline and scoff who also feel that a California jury can determine glyphosate causes cancer.pic.twitter.com/yWRElahSzk
I read they deliberately used the fabricated evidence from the IARC
Not sure everyone thinks it stinks. Can't trust the corporations. Can't trust the science. Maybe if the corporations and science can't be trusted any more, this is the only way. Maybe health can improve as well.
The IARC/WHO report was hazard based, not risk based. Like saying ‘ban all paracetamol’ because it’s toxic whereas the actual real risk of overdose is low.
Spare a thought in this fiasco for any agricultural workers generally who do have disease associated with their task of handling agrichemicals.
Good approach I think & same here. Am looking for good accounts of the legal aspects. Too many are speaking before understanding the court case IMHO. (I have tackled the role of regulatory bodies in part because of a politico's call in NZ, but that's not about the case itself.)
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.