If a pharmacist won't do his job and fill a legal prescription for a legal medication because of his religious beliefs, then his religious beliefs are incompatible with his profession and he should find another line of work. For shame, @Walgreens. 1/http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2018/06/24/walgreens-pharmacist-refuses-to-give-woman-medicine-to-induce-miscarriage/ …
-
-
Here's the woman's account of how humiliated she felt because of Brian Hreniuc's insensitive actions. 3/https://twitter.com/raininblack/status/1010512744691494913 …
Show this thread -
As for
@Walgreens, it "allows pharmacists to step away from filling a prescription for which they have a moral objection." Screw that. A pharmacy is there to serve patients, not the oh-so-sensitive religious objections of pharmacists. 4/ https://www.buzzfeed.com/nidhisubbaraman/a-walgreens-pharmacist-denied-a-womans-prescription-for …Show this thread -
I've said it more times than I can remember. If your religious beliefs prevent you from doing part of your job, then you shouldn't be in that line of work, particularly a line of work that involves providing care for patients. You fail. 5/5
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Q: Do 'strongly held beliefs' exempt one from following HIPPA requirements? If not, Walgreens should walk him to the door. Skirts the elephant in the room but addresses the immediate PR disaster. Suboptimal, but until APhA demands patients are put first, nothing's going to change
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Exactly, he violated HIPAA and that woman's CONSTITUTIONAL right to privacy.
Discriminatory and wrong!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.