I have no problem with people having full, accurate information. In fact, I think they should. That isn't what this bill does. Now answer mine.
-
-
Replying to @doritmi @VegarOttesen and
This bill doesn't do what you describe. Do you not trust doctors and nurses to give people in-depth details on it? Because right now, many are not giving their patients full, accurate information, like this:http://www.fox2detroit.com/news/local-news/oakland-county-mom-in-court-battle-over-not-vaccinating-her-child …
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @Right_to_Life @VegarOttesen and
The language of the bill was quoted to you. You linked to a court session, not a patient/doctor interaction.
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @doritmi @Right_to_Life and
Also, that woman is an all around antivaxer. She doesn't want to vaccinate, period. She's just using the "fetal tissue" gambit as an excuse, as many antivaxers do. Note how she doesn't say she'd vaccinate her children with vaccines that aren't manufactured using those cell lines.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
If Dr. Jack Kevorkian of all people had an ethical objection to a vaccine based on the use of abortion, we'll defend that objection; we don't decide if someone is on our team first. We don't care what she does about vaccines unrelated to abortion.
4 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Right_to_Life @gorskon and
They are such hypocrites. You are defending the rights of diseases basically.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TurtleZoot @Right_to_Life and
Another explanation is that they value the lives of embryos and fetuses more than they value the lives of living children. I find that one just as plausible.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @TurtleZoot and
Do embryos and fetuses meet the definition of human life, doctor? Enlighten us.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Right_to_Life @TurtleZoot and
A rather obvious dodge. You're the one asserting that they are human life. The burden of evidence is therefore upon you to back up your assertion. Logical fallacy: Shifting the burden of proof.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @TurtleZoot and
You are the one asserting they are not (in the face of scientific consensus), and we've already explained our position and definition, and your entire train of argument is one giant appeal to authority.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
So RTL thinks it knows logical fallacies, does it? 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.