It pains me to see all the misinformation re RTT. It’s NOT a new right. It allows patients ineligible for trials & who have no treatment options to ask the company making experimental drugs if they may try the drug. (U’ve been able to do that 4 decades.) Access isn’t guaranteed
-
-
Replying to @ABatemanHouse
It helps to eliminate concerns, of legal action a company or a doctor may have for prescribing such a drug that has not been FDA-approved yet. The medical industry, especially, is always afraid of being sued for trying something outside of the box. Please try to be more positive
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MaNoLiToCoNo
I can’t be more positive if it doesn’t square with the facts! I’ve NEVER had a company tell me liability was a concern in their decisionmaking re access & 2 separate searches of law literature turned up no such cases. There r ways to make companies more willing: liability’s not
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @ABatemanHouse @MaNoLiToCoNo
As for drs, maybe. Maybe they were scared of being sued. But all drs in the US already have insurance that would cover them in case of such suits, &the likelihood of the suit being successful is, in my opinion as a non-lawyer, exceedingly slim. (Have discussed with real lawyers!)
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ABatemanHouse
You couldn't be more wrong. Most doctors do not have malpractice insurance. Please stay focused on the issue. This is about the pharmaceutical companies
5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MaNoLiToCoNo @ABatemanHouse
Completely incorrect. Nearly all doctors are required to have malpractice insurance as a condition of obtaining privileges at hospitals and healthcare facilities. Some states require it for licensure.
2 replies 1 retweet 12 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @ABatemanHouse
Again, ladies and gentlemen. No one wants to get sued. Any legislation that alliws a doctor to think & prescribe, outside the box, for people that desperately need alternative treatment, is a good thing Something's better than nothing Cost of Rx & Ins. Co's have destroyed MDs
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MaNoLiToCoNo @ABatemanHouse
Nice pivot to ignore the fact that your claim that most doctors don't have malpractice insurance was bullshit.
3 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @ABatemanHouse
Gorski...You're Not Very Good At This Ocala Post - Florida doctors are not required to carry malpractice insurance http://www.ocalapost.com/florida-doctors-are-not-required-to-carry-malpractice-insurance/ … STAY IN YOUR LANE AND STICK TO YOUR ONCOLOGY
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Quote from you: "You couldn't be more wrong. Most doctors do not have malpractice insurance." Nothing you have posted supports that. All you've shown is that a small minority of doctors in a single state don't carry Insurance. Math. How does that work?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.