1/2 We don't want people to carry guns because: 1) There's no requirement that the person be "responsible" 2) Because handguns aren't super accurate in trained hands and those bullets end up going somewherehttps://www.rawstory.com/2015/09/texas-good-guy-with-a-gun-shoots-carjacking-victim-in-head-then-runs-away/ …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Yes. Every responsible gun owner is responsible right up until the second they're not. And mistakes with deadly things -- when such mistakes are simple to avoid -- should not be encouraged. This country has a ridiculous amount of gun violence due to a ridiculous amount of guns.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I can also apply my logic to other things that are, for some reason, not freedoms. Why can't you keep as much explosive material handy as you want? I'm sure you'd be responsible with dynamite. And if you outlaw it, only outlaws will use it, right?
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Guns are never used to perpetrate violence, only defend against it?
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Your tool is never used for your intended purpose. ("Never" in statistical terms.) You are far, far more likely to shoot yourself or a loved one than use your gun to stop a crime. Your gun, in public, is far more likely to be a danger to me than of benefit to me.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.