That’s not his main argument. A concerning position he’s taken in defending himself is (paraphrasing) “of course I’m not advocating the raping of women be the only method of sex inequality distribution. There’s also monetary redistribution for prostitution and monogamy programs”
Still don’t see where I misrepresented him. If someone is suggesting a redistribution of women’s bodies as a viable option to combating incel violence and anger, that’s flirting with the advocation of rape
-
-
He didn't suggest that, as I've noted repeatedly in this thread, and as he has said repeatedly. Let's try specifics: "That’s not his main argument." It was, if you'd read the original post. "he’s advocating for a redistribution of wealth to help poor people" Not even close.
-
Hes literally advocating to us the methods of combating the redistribution of income and sexual inequality (which is a bullshit term tbh) because he claims the point of his article/discussion is to question why one would be concerned over income inequality over sexual
-
thus, because hes criticizing those who don't see them as equal, it would be reasonable to believe he would opt for similar methods of combating the "issues". Treating money and income on the same level as a human being, which is asinine. This is the trouble his argument gets ..
-
..people who try to defend his literal statement: theyre defending a shitty position and being pedantic about what he really means.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.