Without the Wuhan travel ban or the national emergency response, there would have been 744,000 confirmed #COVID19 cases outside Wuhan by February 19. It reduced 96% of the cases anticipated in the absence of interventions to 29,839, shows a preliminary report on #medRxivpic.twitter.com/P9Cwo6eUEG
-
-
-
this doesn't contradict the headline.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
How many infected Wuhanese escaped - many. The first Covid-19 is Wuhan resident. So Thailand and France etc.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Most of these averted cases would have been in China because rest of the world would have quarantined it self from China. Secondly China missed the glory of protecting world by suppressing beginning of pendamic. Thirdly with your food habits you may again start new pendamic.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
If Xi Jinping would have ordered lockdowns two months earlier when he knew about outbreaks we could have prevented 5 million people traveling through Wuhan and infecting every reach of the globe. The Chinese government must pay reimburse the world for costs associated w/ COVID19
-
We didn't know it was that big then,we just thought it's another cold,Xi isn't a doctor. Besides,most nations around the world are doing even worse…so stop yelling and let's get this over with.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
There are 322 COVID-related papers on medRxiv - please always provide a *direct* link!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.