the Senate rules may not contemplate/authorize a mistrial motion. I would argue the rules as adopted NEVER contemplated the president’s lawyers would have hidden from the Senate, the Chief Justice and the American people such egregious, disqualifying information (as recently
-
-
Show this thread
-
disclosed by John Bolton). Cipollone perpetrated a unimaginable fraud on the Senate and the American people and the Dems should not go quietly into that dark acquittal. Move for a mistrial and see what the Chief Justice says.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Glenn, is it reasonably possible for
@RepAdamSchiff To subpoena John Bolton - 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
How could it be a legitimate trial without witnesses and evidences withheld?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Yes. But the problem is .... within the vote Friday night was a clause that prohibits further motions to be submitted. I’m not sure he’d have an opportunity other than in his closing remarks. It wouldn’t be voted on.
-
McConnell closed the case preventing any motions
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
what about this? Is this business as usual? Senators overseeing impeachment trial got campaign cash from Trump legal team membershttps://www.opensecrets.org/news/2020/01/senators-overseeing-impeachment-got-campaign-cash-from-trump-team/ …
-
This. Yes. This information should be mentioned and at minimum added the impeachment record. Senators who accepted bribes should be recused. Senators who took Trumps cash should not be permitted to speak.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.