You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
As a board member, it is appropriate for you to investigate issues raised about FSF leaders, yes. Calling them "slanderous accusations" and demanding info that "holds up under oath" is not part of a fair and objective investigation, & casts doubt on your ability to conduct one.
When I wrote late 12SEP, I was referring to a long string of tweets in May 2018. One person sends a lot of tweets about something she did not see first-hand. Everyone I consulted said tweets are just tweets. You can’t do anything if all you have is tweets by a non-witness.
As others have pointed out, this is an incorrect and culture-destroying interpretation of your duties and powers as a board member. At some point in the postmortem I hope you have an opportunity to review those things.
Firstly, there are far more allegations/criticisms than a single string of tweets.
Second, there are absolutely ways to investigate things like this. Both things that are "just tweets" and the several non-tweet examples given in this thread. It seems, though, that you're looking for an excuse to say "sorry there's nothing we can do".
Third, at this point if you *are* going to investigate I strongly recommend asking an independent person or org to do so. You've seemed very defensive in these threads and I don't think you have the impartiality or experience to lead on this.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
