Conversation

Replying to
Glad that you've made the correction. I really hope some discussion is had about why this happened and why clearly some assumptions were made when literally none of the publication information for the book would give you the name you listed.
1
3
Kirk Denton made exactly the same mistake in his MCLC post. Why the same mistake? I am not sure what is so difficult to understand here. Someone saw a name and used cisgender assumptions and decided it must be a mistake. That's not malice. That is bias and should be addressed.
1
Show replies