Spring til indhold
Ved din brug af Twitters tjenester accepterer du vores brug af cookies. Vi og vores partnere opererer globalt og bruger cookies til blandt andet statistik, personlig tilpasning og annoncer.
  • Forside Forside Forside, aktuel side.
  • Om

Gemte søgninger

  • Fjern
  • I denne samtale
    Verificeret kontoBeskyttede tweets @
Foreslåede brugere
  • Verificeret kontoBeskyttede tweets @
  • Verificeret kontoBeskyttede tweets @
  • Sprog: Dansk
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Deutsch
    • English
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Har du en konto? Log ind
    Har du en konto?
    · Glemt din adgangskode?

    Ny på Twitter?
    Tilmeld dig
gin_and_tacoss profil
Mass for Shut-ins (is a podcast)
Mass for Shut-ins (is a podcast)
Mass for Shut-ins (is a podcast)
@gin_and_tacos

Tweets

Mass for Shut-ins (is a podcast)

@gin_and_tacos

Political Science prof. Writer @thenation @thebafflermag @deadspin etc. Podcast: Mass for Shut-ins https://tinyurl.com/yctxpz8r  emburmila@gmail

Chicago, IL
ginandtacos.com
Tilmeldt juli 2017

Tweets

  • © 2019 Twitter
  • Om
  • Hjælpecenter
  • Vilkår
  • Privatlivspolitik
  • Cookies
  • Annonce-info
Afvis
Forrige
Næste

Gå til en persons profil

Gemte søgninger

  • Fjern
  • I denne samtale
    Verificeret kontoBeskyttede tweets @
Foreslåede brugere
  • Verificeret kontoBeskyttede tweets @
  • Verificeret kontoBeskyttede tweets @

Promover dette Tweet

Bloker

  • Tweet med en lokalitet

    Du kan føje lokalitetsoplysninger til dine Tweets, såsom din by eller præcise placering, fra webben og via tredjepartsapplikationer. Du kan altid slette lokalitetshistorikken for dine Tweets. Lær mere

    Dine lister

    Opret en ny liste


    Under 100 tegn, valgfri

    Privatliv

    Kopier link til tweet

    Indlejring af dette tweet

    Embed this Video

    Føj dette Tweet til dit websted ved at kopiere koden nedenfor. Lær mere

    Føj denne video til dit websted ved at kopiere koden nedenfor. Lær mere

    Hmm, der var et problem med forbindelsen til serveren.

    Ved at indlejre Twitter-indhold på dit websted eller i din app accepterer du Twitters udvikleraftale og udviklerpolitik.

    Forhåndsvisning

    Derfor ser du denne annonce

    Log ind på Twitter

    · Glemt din adgangskode?
    Har du ingen konto? Tilmeld dig »

    Tilmeld dig Twitter

    Ikke på Twitter? Tilmeld dig, find de emner du holder af, og bliv opdateret så snart noget sker.

    Tilmeld dig
    Har du en konto? Log ind »

    To-vejs (sende og modtage) tjenestenumre:

    Land Kode For kunder af
    USA 40404 (nogen)
    Canada 21212 (nogen)
    Storbritannien 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brasilien 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Irland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    Indien 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesien 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italien 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » Se sms-tjenestenumre for andre lande

    Bekræftelse

     

    Velkommen hjem!

    Denne tidslinje er der, hvor du vil bruge mest af din tid og konstant få opdateringer om det, der interesserer dig.

    Fungerer Tweets ikke for dig?

    Hold over profilbilledet og klik på Følger-knappen for at stoppe med at følge enhver konto.

    Sig en masse med en smule

    Når du ser et Tweet, du elsker, kan du trykke på hjertet — det viser personen, der skrev det, din påskønnelse.

    Spred budskabet

    Den hurtigste måde, hvorpå du kan dele en andens Tweet med dine følgere, er et Retweet. Tryk på ikonet for at sende det straks.

    Deltag i samtalen

    Tilføj dine tanker om ethvert Tweet med et svar. Find et emne, du er passioneret omkring, og hop direkte ind i samtalen.

    Få det seneste at vide

    Få øjeblikkelig indsigt i det, folk snakker om lige nu.

    Få mere af det, du elsker

    Følg flere konti for at få øjeblikkelige opdateringer om de emner, du er interesseret i.

    Opdag, hvad der sker.

    Se de nyeste samtaler om ethvert emne her og nu.

    Gå aldrig glip af et Øjeblik

    Følg de bedste historier, mens de sker.

    Mass for Shut-ins (is a podcast)‏ @gin_and_tacos 18. apr.

    ┳┻| ┻┳| ┳┻| psst! hey kid! ┻┳| ┳┻| ┻┳| ┳┻| ┻┳| ┳┻| _ ┻┳| •.•) If impeachment is only ┳┻|⊂ノ feasible when the outcome ┻┳| is certain and there's no ┳┻| political risk, then ┻┳| impeachment is effectively ┳┻| nonexistent

    10.50 - 18. apr. 2019
    • 2.487 Retweets
    • 15.456 Likes
    • Victoria B Annietiques🌹 Michaela Mays 🦄Nicholas (🌷I🌺like🌼flowers💐) Knudson🦄 DUMBLEBORE Bri Smuclge Savage Fen
    51 svar 2.487 retweets 15.456 likes
      1. Mass for Shut-ins (is a podcast)‏ @gin_and_tacos 18. apr.

        Check out my soundcloud raps / podcasthttps://www.stitcher.com/podcast/mass-for-shutins-the-gin-and-tacos-podcast/e/60116688?autoplay=true …

        1 svar 1 retweet 30 likes
        Vis denne tråd
        Tak. Twitter bruger dette til at forbedre din tidslinje. Fortryd
        Fortryd
      1. Ny samtale
      2. Stephen H. 🌻 🌪 🌈 🏀‏ @stevehwilson 18. apr.
        Svarer @gin_and_tacos @jbouie

        If you calculate impeachment (and almost certain acquittal in the Senate) meaningfully increases the likelihood of Trump’s re-election , it’s neither politically savvy or the “moral” thing to do. The goal is getting him out of office as soon as possible.

        4 svar 0 retweets 19 likes
      3. Radical Goats‏ @RadicalGoats 18. apr.
        Svarer @stevehwilson @gin_and_tacos @jbouie

        How do people calculate that? I want to see those calculations.

        1 svar 0 retweets 14 likes
      4. Christopher Freiss‏ @CFreiss_boston 18. apr.
        Svarer @RadicalGoats @stevehwilson og

        He gets a huge political W if he comes out unscathed and can use that to sail to reelection. His supporters aren't leaving him and therefore he only needs to convince a few others it was a Democratic hack job. Plenty will believe him.

        1 svar 0 retweets 3 likes
      5. Radical Goats‏ @RadicalGoats 18. apr.
        Svarer @CFreiss_boston @stevehwilson og

        That’s the thing. I want to see how you calculated that. That conclusion is based on what?

        1 svar 0 retweets 7 likes
      6. Mass for Shut-ins (is a podcast)‏ @gin_and_tacos 18. apr.
        Svarer @RadicalGoats @CFreiss_boston og

        The calculation is "I made it up"

        1 svar 0 retweets 15 likes
      7. Radical Goats‏ @RadicalGoats 18. apr.
        Svarer @gin_and_tacos @CFreiss_boston og

        I think it was Bruce Schneier who said that whenever someone explains a complete fuckup with “we took a calculated risk,” you should ask to see the calculations.

        1 svar 0 retweets 6 likes
      8. Christopher Freiss‏ @CFreiss_boston 18. apr.
        Svarer @RadicalGoats @gin_and_tacos og

        Incumbent advantage and the conservative lean of the parts of the country he needs to get over the hump are what I think makes up that calculation. I'd say those are huge factors if he gets exonerated in helping him pick up swing votes.

        1 svar 0 retweets 1 like
      9. Radical Goats‏ @RadicalGoats 18. apr.
        Svarer @CFreiss_boston @gin_and_tacos og

        Incumbent advantage and the conservative lean of the country are not relevant to whether a failed impeachment helps or harms a President’s re-election chances. Your calculation is looking very shoddy so far.

        1 svar 0 retweets 6 likes
      10. 5 svar mere
      1. Ny samtale
      2.  🍑 אני צריך הירוק‏ @JonBrouQ22 18. apr.
        Svarer @gin_and_tacos @daciatakesnote

        Let's not try things because we might fail is quite the argument here.

        1 svar 1 retweet 96 likes
      3. Ramar‏ @Duvisited 18. apr.
        Svarer @JonBrouQ22 @gin_and_tacos @daciatakesnote

        Okay, but this is a "will definitely fail" situation.

        6 svar 0 retweets 28 likes
      4. Phil Caravella‏ @Phil_Caravella 18. apr.
        Svarer @Duvisited @JonBrouQ22 og

        Even if the impeachment fails, there must be some value to humiliating him via public testimony and further exposure of his crimes (minus redaction this time around).

        3 svar 1 retweet 67 likes
      5. Mike Sorice‏ @MGSorice 18. apr.
        Svarer @Phil_Caravella @Duvisited og

        But when it inevitably fails, which is the equivalent to an acquittal, Donald Trump and Rush Limbaugh can rightly claim that he was found not guilty of all the crimes we know he’s committ(ed/ing). That’s worse for the resistance. The best course of action: vote Dems in 2020.

        6 svar 1 retweet 17 likes
      6. Jim‏ @staxringold 18. apr.
        Svarer @MGSorice @Phil_Caravella og

        Ah yes, because he definitely won't (and isn't presently) doing that already. Let's not do X because Trump and Limbaugh will lie about it to their sheep who take them at their word is an argument you can apply to literally anything

        1 svar 2 retweets 47 likes
      7. Mike Sorice‏ @MGSorice 18. apr.
        Svarer @staxringold @Phil_Caravella og

        Except that during the Lewinsky scandal, when the Senate acquitted Bill Clinton, the Republican Party lost seats in the midterm. The opposition party NEVER loses seats in the midterms. An unsuccessful inquisitorial impeachment caused that loss. It’ll cause one for Dems, too.

        4 svar 0 retweets 10 likes
      8.  🍑 אני צריך הירוק‏ @JonBrouQ22 18. apr.
        Svarer @MGSorice @staxringold og

        Bad example

        1 svar 0 retweets 16 likes
      9. 5 svar mere
      1. Ny samtale
      2. Kevin J‏ @kevinmj76 18. apr.
        Svarer @gin_and_tacos @chick_in_kiev

        At the very least, it would put @GOP Senators on the record tolerating breathtaking levels of obstruction.

        3 svar 0 retweets 24 likes
      3. Chrissy Golightly‏ @CrissyGolightly 19. apr.
        Svarer @kevinmj76 @gin_and_tacos og

        And actually obstructing

        0 svar 0 retweets 6 likes
      4. Afslutning af samtale
      1. Ny samtale
      2. trash panda‏ @instmonk 18. apr.
        Svarer @gin_and_tacos

        the constitution was written with the assumption that there would never be political parties; adopting a first-past-the-post voting system for every major elected office made its ultimate failure inevitable

        1 svar 0 retweets 1 like
      3. trash panda‏ @instmonk 18. apr.
        Svarer @instmonk @gin_and_tacos

        fwiw i don't think attempted impeachment would be a huge political win or loss for trump; his approval rating will stay at 40% unless he becomes totally undeniably senile, launches a nuclear strike against white people, or personally performs an abortion live on tv

        1 svar 0 retweets 11 likes
      4. Christian Science Monitor Lizard  ⛪  ⚗  💻  🦎‏ @DaveSimons 18. apr.
        Svarer @instmonk @gin_and_tacos

        If it's a brown baby he wins in 2020.

        1 svar 0 retweets 12 likes
      5. Chrissy Golightly‏ @CrissyGolightly 19. apr.
        Svarer @DaveSimons @instmonk @gin_and_tacos

        Underrated gem of a tweet

        0 svar 0 retweets 2 likes
      6. Afslutning af samtale

    Indlæsning ser ud til at tage noget tid.

    Twitter kan være overbelastet eller have en midlertidig forstyrrelse. Prøv igen, eller se flere oplysninger på Twitter Status.

      Promoveret Tweet

      false

      • © 2019 Twitter
      • Om
      • Hjælpecenter
      • Vilkår
      • Privatlivspolitik
      • Cookies
      • Annonce-info