Explicated once in his article about the "fetus men".they need their precious institutionalized intellectual legitimacy, and must protect it at all costs, and the way to do it is simply declaring everyone who falls outside their largely costal academic bubbles to be pseuds.
-
-
Show this thread
-
Peterson is a depth psychologist, not a clinical cognitive-behavioural psychologist, the whole invalidation of depth work comes again from another academic game, during the 60s onwards, Freudians basically controlled academic psychology and went on to marginalized jungianism.
Show this thread -
Now the postmodernists, feminists, sociologists, etc. Have latched onto Freud and Lacan, Jung is pushed further to the outskirts because of course, myth is tradition, and a stone throw away from metaphysics, We can't have that, that might offend secular lib sensibilities!
Show this thread -
The joke is on these people though because Freud worship has seen better days, while Jung went on to receive a greater presence and legitimacy outside of orthodox academia, in the art worlds, the new age, the fringes of academia and internet based guruism, etc.
Show this thread -
Peterson is quite an anomaly in terms of academia because the academic interest in Jung until this last century was buried with J Campbell. Anyways..of course Freud is more useful to these types and to the cathedral:
Show this thread -
We can't have people thinking they are anything more than biomachines following a programming, the proles might discover that they have a soul you know! This too...is another game played at our expense. The denial of the soul is by far the greatest crime in my view.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.