It's so bad. Suggesting that maybe the sexual revolution has had negative consequences in the form of swathes of average men (not even below average!) being locked out of the normative process of family-creation- "No!" Says the serial monogomous female journo. "They deserved it."
-
-
the mans response makes no sense. people are marrying within their class, but also marriage is in the decline. a more likely scenario is the highest classes are marrying and the low-mid classes are in a madmax sexual hell
-
Precisely
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Classic blue-check behaviour. Subtly change the phenomenon in question (from inceldom to a specific concept of assortative mating) & provide empirical evidence about a claim nobody was really advancing. This convinces a subset of uninspiring university-‘educated’ that they ‘won’.
-
They are totally ignorant of the real context, and course to them everyone who is not in their ilk is a pseud unworthy of being taken seriously, it's the game that they set out for the beginning premise.
-
Prophet of the Future: This tree is blocking my view. Arbiter of Reality: Actually, trees photosynthesize with their leaves & draw water & nutrients with their roots.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
