The answer is a rearriculation of traditional masculinity in its fullest sense, not a (largely media propagated) vile strawman of what traditional masculine norms are. It is as simple as young men needing a higher metaphysical purpose in life, and escaping the confusions of 
https://twitter.com/michaelianblack/status/963949556953157632 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @giantgio
Here's a good place to mention three dominant types of masculinity we've inherited from the middle ages: the knightly capacity for violence, the priestly/scholarly capacity to distance oneself from beasts, and the capacity to take care of one's own and organize change (craftsman)
1 reply 3 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @ModernHermetics @giantgio
As a society we have demonized the first form, praised the second, and found heaps 'problematic' issues with the third. In my opinion men ought to strive in all three categories if they want to cultivate a matured sense of masculinity that is robust and sane.
2 replies 2 retweets 4 likes
That's a very great way of putting it, and following the language of Jung (not the derivative JBP!) there is the individuation of each part of the divine masculine coming together into its own as a whole, the same for the divine feminine, women too have to integrate their parts.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.