1. Man I'm really tired of politics and drama, so let me make a mini thread on art and politics (wowzerz!!) This came from me watching a vid from @XELASOMA_ART called "artists are not special people".
-
Show this thread
-
2. my good internet chum had a few brilliant thoughts in this piece about the nature of the artist as a hero, or rather, a replacement for meaning in modern society, same with sports types and even politicians.
1 reply 1 retweet 8 likesShow this thread -
3. back in the day in both the east and the west, the artist was beholden to, and achieved legitimacy from institutions, especially religious institutions, religion and art share an eternal symbiosis....now artists in the "post-metaphysical age" are beholden to only their own
1 reply 3 retweets 10 likesShow this thread -
4. creativity and are forced to forge for meaning once more, there simply is no mass institution that is sufficiently sacred enough, well, besides churches and other religious ones, but they need to seek an artistic rebirth.
1 reply 1 retweet 6 likesShow this thread -
5. all of the mass institution, government, academia, sports, etc. that fund art are so profane or even downright satanic in nature that there cant possibly be really good art that can be produced by them. of course this is hyperbole, there are good pieces, but imo, pop music?
1 reply 2 retweets 8 likesShow this thread -
6. hollywood? CULTURE INDUSTRY? give me a break. you know Marcuse thought classical and realist art that is pleasant, like my pypo the impressionists, would be used to give people a false consciousness, and distract them from their proletarian misery, THE EXACT OPPOSITE IS TRUE!
1 reply 1 retweet 6 likesShow this thread -
7. the modern art world has in many ways weaponized ugliness, but this being said, even the ugly has a purpose, rather, the great works of art do not passify and distract the masses but the bland, the soft, the mass-codified, the "comfy" forms of art that are "pleasant"
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likesShow this thread -
8. but not in the way the great works of art, the impressionists in particular, are "pleasant" on a deeper level, most popular art is simply sexual wish fulfillment. another idea Alex presented, the nature of the culture industry as (to use Deleuze's term) overcoding the globe:
1 reply 2 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
9. the culture indsutry has even imported the western and very bland definitions of beauty to the east for example. the zen and taoist painters were not these atomized artists rendering the full presence of beauty, but were immersed in spiritual practice through art.
1 reply 1 retweet 7 likesShow this thread -
10. having studied this in grad school, the Japanese and Chinese did not even have an idea of aesthetic beauty until the late 19th century! (read the works of Francois Jullien) shout out to
@Bobsmithumz1 reply 1 retweet 8 likesShow this thread
this is ironic considering anime weebs and niceposters obsess over Japanese art and "beauty", and how these neotinous anime girls are the "platonic form" of beauty, this is totally alien to classical Japanese art, anime is the hyper capitalist americanist version of east art,
-
-
11. anime in many ways is a symptom of the mass culture industry smoothing out the cultural spaces of the world, what im really saying is that anime is just ORIENTALISM in more ways than one.
0 replies 3 retweets 13 likesShow this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.