ofcourse we exist. We're the ones paying for the philosophy department to exist. 50% of our contract money is taken by the University as overhead to give to people who don't bring in any grant money at all.
-
-
-
That presupposes every aspect of STEM brings in monetary value, and that only economic value is intrinsically good.
-
well if you find no value in it, I would greatly appreciate it if you would write to them and convince them to give our money back... Afterall we want it and you don't even seem to know if it has value or not...
-
Or am I just presupposing we could hire more people to do real work if we had more of the money we bid for?
-
Ah but I forgot I'm the bad guy here. Not the ones biting the hand that feeds them... How very immoral of me...
-
I'm not necessarily disagreeing with everything you are saying, imo humanities departments need to only accept those that wish to be good scholars, in challenging the materialistic basis of value you are positing.
-
I am in this instance just extra upset by the original philosopher supporter attacking scientists to begin with and acting as though he should have equal respect to people to take harder classes and have harder to earn degrees than him. But also 50% is too much overhead.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
