We would even find the need for a piece of technology like that in the first place!
-
Show this thread
-
They want to give "consent" to a piece of machinery, this serves a number of purposes that isn't limited to demonizing male sexuality...
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
But that's a part of it. We are so confused at our moral priorities that we could even think of such things! They can't question any form
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
Of sexuality, so outright banning sex Slave bots is out of the question, for that would be "wrong" since unfettered and rampant sexual
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
Expression is a must in the modern world, so they must exploit a loophole. So here we are, contemplating sex bots which will only further
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
Alienate people, destroy male images of women, and totally take apart human intimacy at the knees, God I wish feminists were more honest, in
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
The 80s they had good points about the media/porn and now techno-alienation of women, "sex positive" third wave is actually doing the
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
Job of corporate objectification now a days, how messed up is that. But that's the game, the corporation who monopolizes the sex slave bot
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
Industry in the future will probably put a veneer of social justice wrapping on their PR image and corporate speak, will probably give to
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
SJW causes and the like, and justify the damage they will inevitably do to relations between the sexes by paying "sex positive" speakers
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread
(You know the ones) to give talks at corporate events, this is how the game is played now a days.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.