Neoabsolutism time again. This time: The Anthropoetics of Power…https://thejournalofneoabsolutism.wordpress.com/2017/05/02/the-anthropoetics-of-power/ …
-
-
Replying to @TAJackson20
Previously: We noted that all cultural changes are epiphenomena of power and demonstrated that this applies to social sciences.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @TAJackson20
So, what do we propsed to replace democratic sciences? Well, buckle in!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TAJackson20
First, we recap liberal anthropology and explain why, no, you can't just go back to earlier liberalism that wasn't as insane.pic.twitter.com/3TyWzIC4Vr
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @TAJackson20
This reminds of bishop Williamson liking peter hitchins but saying he is still liberal and does not go farther back enough before liberalism
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @giantgio @TAJackson20
Seeing as how peter only want to go back to the less insane glorious revolution times, it's still revolutionary liberalism!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @giantgio
Right, the only reason they didn't screw up everything as extensively as today is because they lacked the Techne.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like
Exactly! A very Heideggarian point 



Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.